🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.