Skip to content
Spark Journal is a literary blog featuring creative writing…

The Iconic Puzzle Game Couldn't Succeed at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

Whenever a significant honors show draws close, you'll find a demand to include of new categories to honor overlooked contributions and satisfy the passions of fans with niche passions.

Another commentator has already made for a horror game category. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are tabletop games, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward just as with other blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument supporting my request is the most urgent above others. Here's the proposal: We need an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Organizing artistic expressions isn't exact; it remains highly personal, and typically spark debates and end in fuzzy definitions. It's understandable that cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents a necessary evil in the world of video games, showing incredible range they hardly constitute as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, and for games of all stripes to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include classifications covering Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these classifications successfully include a lot of ground, and you can find room accommodating various experiences.

Different situation exists for brain-teasing titles. No suitable classification appears to accommodate them. Consider three of this year’s best games, all very different: building puzzles in a particular game, intense tile-matching of another game, thought-provoking social scenarios from additional release. What category would fit them among existing types? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens outstanding logic titles released every year without proper recognition at major award shows, unless they happen to qualify award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive Indie races.

  • An iconic brain-teaser got overlooked completely that year
  • A different innovative game was excluded during that ceremony
  • Popular arranging title received no acknowledgment that year
  • Just some puzzle games barely qualified for niche award types

Significance of Puzzle Games

Commonly they're small games, yet the craft behind logic titles is of massive significance. Well-known matching games count as most popular titles globally and have been for over a decade.

The famous puzzle experience rivals famous sandbox experiences claiming status as best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running as greatest title ever. Puzzle games are foundational within interactive entertainment, and engaging across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles every year with ease — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave so many good games out.

To emphasize again, these are games that otherwise have no home at major gaming awards. Brain-teaser creators operate at the challenging frontier interactive creation, developing some of the purest expressions within interactive entertainment. Similar to movie stunt professionals, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting generations.

Written by

Kathy Johnson

A poet and literary critic with a passion for contemporary verse and narrative techniques.

Spark Journal

Type to search articles.